Re: WCAG 2.2 updates meeting- Friday 19th 2022

Hi

The clickable link goes to a Microsoft link checking service that seems to be having problems. If you use the W3C URL instead, that worked for me


https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/fdbff191-ae2e-48ee-87d7-37b2b20c653a/20210702T110000<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fevents%2Fmeetings%2Ffdbff191-ae2e-48ee-87d7-37b2b20c653a%2F20210702T110000&data=04%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7Ce876d5cd486c4b2929af08d994ac9c47%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637704291471684968%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=7IT%2Bei9PsSmwnRcnfybCQggRpQ91NUyQVZk56W%2BQqVM%3D&reserved=0>

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Friday, August 19, 2022 at 08:14
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: WCAG 2.2 updates meeting- Friday 19th 2022
Been trying to join but the link doesn’t seem to launch a meeting…

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Director, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 8:42 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: WCAG 2.2 updates meeting- Friday 19th 2022
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 8:41 AM


EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.


Hi everyone,

We will use the Friday slot for reviewing the outstanding focus-appearance and editorial updates, so if you are involved in any of those, it could help to speed things up to join us.

The meeting is 11am-12 Boston time (same start time as the Tuesday meeting), details here:
https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/fdbff191-ae2e-48ee-87d7-37b2b20c653a/20210702T110000<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fevents%2Fmeetings%2Ffdbff191-ae2e-48ee-87d7-37b2b20c653a%2F20210702T110000&data=05%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cc01f4a6f86ea4492ae3408da8117079e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637964233300624465%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WzubNTO0iV%2BR1XCL2TRFBPJInAk3FZH%2B4WwBd83daZI%3D&reserved=0>

I don’t think there will be much point in going over the user-agent aspect again, but we can make progress on:


  *   Focus appearance: The visual presentation paragraph;
  *   Focus appearance: Making sub-components require focus indicators;
  *   Focus appearance: Tweaks to improve inter-rate reliability #2568
  *   Target size - Problems with the Equivalent exception #2569
  *   Clarify Accessible Authentication by including "remembering user names and passwords" in the SC text #2577
  *   Editorial update to accessible-auth exception #2608
  *   Improvement for Dragging Movement definition note #2595
  *   Clarification for Consistent Help, 2nd Note #2596

See the surveys for details:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc2/<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fwcag22-misc2%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cc01f4a6f86ea4492ae3408da8117079e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637964233300624465%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0hBY7ICAK1iP5sGKo1cFHgT9ng8o4EMksEZbBGRk%2Bu8%3D&reserved=0>
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/focus-appearance-updates<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Ffocus-appearance-updates&data=05%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7Cc01f4a6f86ea4492ae3408da8117079e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637964233300780706%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=M8fhAPWYsJTzjTwr5KfZ6sbtOUj0R9u%2FhTi1QV6vBHI%3D&reserved=0>

Sorry for the late notice, any decisions will be reviewed at the Tuesday meeting, but getting the discussions in advance can help speed that up.

Kind regards,

-Alastair