Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation

I’ll move my +1 to a -1 for the reasons Shawn and Wilco have mentioned.

Todd

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 06:41, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:

> -1
>
> For the reason Shawn stated. As well as for unresolved issues on Focus Appearance, and for how the decision to not resolve those focus appearance issues came about.
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 3:31 PM Shawn Lauriat <lauriat@google.com> wrote:
>
>> -1, this draft still has Page Break Navigation, [which failed CFC](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022JulSep/0054.html) ([Decisions](https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions))
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:31 AM Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Todd
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 04:25, Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Call for Consensus – ends Thursday August 11that 23:59pm Boston time.
>>>>
>>>> The Working Group has approved CFCs for all new normative content in WCAG 2.2 and it is ready to move to Candidate Recommendation.
>>>>
>>>> The draft is athttps://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/
>>>>
>>>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CFC deadline.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
>>>>
>>>> Digital Accessibility Architect
>>>>
>>>> Library of Congress
>>>>
>>>> Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov
>
> --
>
> Wilco Fiers
> Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force