Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum + Enhanced)

+1

*Melanie Philipp, CPACC, WAS | *Director, Services Methodology
| 540-848-5220
Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
www.deque.com


On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:18 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Monday July 18th at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SCs *Focus Not
> Obscured (Minimum), Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced) *and the *Normative
> text *needs to be approved by CFC.
>
>
>
> It can be previewed in the editor’s draft:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-not-obscured-minimum
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-not-obscured-enhanced
>
>
>
> The SC has been discussed previously, Most recently:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/05/24-ag-minutes#item07
>
>
>
> The change history is here:
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-not-obscured.html
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-not-obscured-enhanced.html
>
>
>
> The survey questions are available here:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results
>
>
>
> The github issues are listed here:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+focus+obscured
>
> (There are several open related to an understanding content updates.)
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>