- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:15:18 -0400
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxEn9bu4vcXxyDDZBfHqUwo=Gfwk6abQyRLCQpOkrdFhEg@mail.gmail.com>
+1... and as a response to Wilco's valid points - many SCs, in their normative text - are broad and don't identify - exactly how to test. Could it be better if we didnt have these nutty timelines? YES. Is this a worthwhile SC that will help users? YES On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, 2:59 PM Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: > > +1 > Jonathan > ------------------------------ > *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 12, 2022 5:44:54 PM > *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > Call For Consensus — ends Friday July 15th at midday Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC *Focus > Appearance *and the *Normative text *needs to be approved by CFC. > > > > It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance > > > > The SC has been discussed a lot, some recent and a key meeting: > > https://www.w3.org/2022/06/28-ag-minutes#item05 > > https://www.w3.org/2022/05/31-ag-minutes#item12 > > https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t05 > > > > The change history is here: > > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance.html > > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance-minimum.html > > > > The survey is available here: > > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results > > > > The github issues are listed here: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%222.4.11+Focus+Appearance+%28min%29%22+ > > > (There are 3 open, related to an understanding content updates.) > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > >
Received on Friday, 15 July 2022 21:15:43 UTC