Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text

Hi,
As Peter said, we are voting "can't live with it" for this SC.

Thank you,
Caryn Pagel
________________________________
From: Bossley, Peter (TR Product) <Peter.Bossley@thomsonreuters.com>
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2022 8:47
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: RE: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text


We are unfortunately taking a can’t live with it position on this SC and are happy to discuss with the chairs further.



From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa..com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 5:45 PM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [EXT] CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text



External Email: Use caution with links and attachments.



Call For Consensus — ends Friday July 15th at midday Boston time.



The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Focus Appearance and the Normative text needs to be approved by CFC.



It can be previewed in the editor’s draft:

https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/*focus-appearance__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv9oTUhu5$>



The SC has been discussed a lot, some recent and a key meeting:

https://www.w3.org/2022/06/28-ag-minutes#item05<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2022/06/28-ag-minutes*item05__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv0FY-a_G$>

https://www..w3.org/2022/05/31-ag-minutes#item12<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2022/05/31-ag-minutes*item12__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv5Ww0WvQ$>

https://www.w3..org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t05<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes*t05__;Iw!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv2XQg3he$>



The change history is here:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv62lqfEL$>

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance-minimum.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance-minimum.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv9ot2bWK$>



The survey is available here:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDvweYB1z4$>



The github issues are listed here:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%222.4.11+Focus+Appearance+%28min%29%22<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is*3Aissue*is*3Aopen*label*3A*222.4.11*Focus*Appearance**A28min*29*22__;JSslKyUlKysrJSUl!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv_9WrqKW$>+

(There are 3 open, related to an understanding content updates.)



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.



Kind regards,



-Alastair

--



@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!dOW9R4Dz9JUc__ou2I75ecTJ0CNDkzdwIaQpi4ngFL3SbZbR2iWytuUNNrufhKFx0XR-dpY4mu-0utk8OEZDv0AJ6yqb$>