Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text

+1


Regards,

Marc Johlic |  johlic@us.ibm.com
Program Director, IBM Accessibility | Product Manager, IBM Equal Access
Toolkit | IBM Design

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 5:47 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Friday July 15th at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC *Focus
> Appearance *and the *Normative text *needs to be approved by CFC.
>
>
>
> It can be previewed in the editor’s draft:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance
>
>
>
> The SC has been discussed a lot, some recent and a key meeting:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/06/28-ag-minutes#item05
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/05/31-ag-minutes#item12
>
> https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t05
>
>
>
> The change history is here:
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance.html
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance-minimum.html
>
>
>
> The survey is available here:
>
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results
>
>
>
> The github issues are listed here:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%222.4.11+Focus+Appearance+%28min%29%22+
>
>
> (There are 3 open, related to an understanding content updates.)
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>