- From: Léonie Watson <lwatson@tetralogical.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:55:34 +0100
- To: "Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0649cb48-ed14-cd4b-d637-bc21ea6b8ad4@tetralogical.com>
+1 On 13/07/2022 00:36, Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael wrote: > > +1 > > *From: *Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 7:05 PM > *To: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list > (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: [EXT] CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text > *Resent-From: *<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 7:05 PM > > +1 > > *From: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 5:47 PM > *To: *WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *[EXT] CFC - WCAG 2.2 Focus Appearance, Normative Text > > Call For Consensus — ends Friday July 15^th at midday Boston time. > > The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC*Focus > Appearance*and the*Normative text*needs to be approved by CFC. > > It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance > > The SC has been discussed a lot, some recent and a key meeting: > > https://www.w3.org/2022/06/28-ag-minutes#item05 > > https://www.w3.org/2022/05/31-ag-minutes#item12 > > https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t05 > > The change history is here: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance.html > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/focus-appearance-minimum.html > > > The survey is available here: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results > > > The github issues are listed here: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%222.4.11+Focus+Appearance+%28min%29%22+ > > > (There are 3 open, related to an understanding content updates.) > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you > “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know > before the CfC deadline. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > @alastc /www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com> > -- Director @TetraLogical https://tetralogical.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2022 09:01:47 UTC