Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 11:02:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHVyjGO6K4Bkt4zbByx6U+Edz7HLER+pq6VTSAU1UEY_wti2Ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hey Alastair, I still don't really follow the argument why, if you're in something like Adobe illustrator, and you have a circle there that when focused, the resize / rotate controls show up. Why wouldn't the circle itself count as the visual indicator that those hidden resize / rotate controls exist? On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:23 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > Yesterday we discussed the ‘design canvas’ exception, for areas of a page > which have multiple (1 to thousands) of things which are editable. > > > > The (very) draft version of that exception can be seen / commented / > refined here: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2288 > > > > “The trigger for hover of focus is an editable item within a region of the > page dedicated to editable items;” > > > > A key thing to understanding this is that: > > It is partly an issue because if you make a design-oriented interface > keyboard-accessible, then focus will trigger this SC rather than hover. > > > > We did discuss removing the focus aspect, but it leaves a logical hole > where anything which shows extra UICs on focus would pass, even if it also > uses hover. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > > > > > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
(image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif)