Re: CFC - Errata, "Changes of context" definition

+1

Op wo 9 feb. 2022 om 16:36 schreef Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 1:20 AM
> *To: *WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] CFC - Errata, "Changes of context" definition
> *Resent-From: *<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 1:18 AM
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday February 14th at midday Boston time. The
> Working Group has discussed an erratum to the definition of “changes of
> context”: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-change-of-context ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍
> ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
>
> This Message Is From an External Sender
>
> This message came from outside your organization.
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday February 14th at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed an erratum to the definition of “changes
> of context”: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-change-of-context
>
>
>
> The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1765/files
>
>
>
> Call minutes:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/08-ag-minutes#t06 and
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/02/01-ag-minutes#item08
>
>
>
> Survey:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc/results
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>