RE: CFC - Errata, "Changes of context" definition

+1

Thx,

ND


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 1:19 AM
To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Errata, "Changes of context" definition
Importance: High


Call For Consensus - ends Monday February 14th at midday Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed an erratum to the definition of "changes of context": https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-change-of-context<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F%23dfn-change-of-context&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C5e8f19c7b1c04f658b3c08d9ebad57f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637799953048313284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=EpoI2%2FcKpUCs6VijOl8QQcfeUlt2mwdhl%2Bono5Azh9w%3D&reserved=0>



The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1765/files<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1765%2Ffiles&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C5e8f19c7b1c04f658b3c08d9ebad57f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637799953048313284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=bUmFNtNC%2FaoViiK%2FgzzCBK7PLhCvxCk2GpyaHFUMR60%3D&reserved=0>



Call minutes:

https://www.w3.org/2022/02/08-ag-minutes#t06<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2022%2F02%2F08-ag-minutes%23t06&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C5e8f19c7b1c04f658b3c08d9ebad57f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637799953048313284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=uu5p0HvSr9JNNS4cbiQtB8FY0Bh9eTu6dO9uj0faAQc%3D&reserved=0> and

https://www.w3.org/2022/02/01-ag-minutes#item08<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2022%2F02%2F01-ag-minutes%23item08&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C5e8f19c7b1c04f658b3c08d9ebad57f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637799953048313284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=NAqqXF7YZdfBiA0Vp3b5b%2FJ2afGZ3v2N%2FBxTJlQ1%2Bws%3D&reserved=0>



Survey:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc/results<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fwcag22-misc%2Fresults&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C5e8f19c7b1c04f658b3c08d9ebad57f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637799953048313284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=dZ7PxOXcn0RHzAiAJ3W6WZY%2BSRZTmHVwou2uRSgxWmQ%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair