Re: CFC - Errata, "Changes of context" definition

+1 to this as an Erratum for WCAG 2.0 and WCAG 2.1
-1 (-50?) if this is to be an Erratum for only WCAG 2.1

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Director, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk



From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 4:21 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Errata, "Changes of context" definition
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 at 4:18 AM


Call For Consensus — ends Monday February 14th at midday Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed an erratum to the definition of “changes of context”: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-change-of-context<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F%23dfn-change-of-context&data=04%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C874d6f5249d048cff1c108d9ebad5371%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637799952989261904%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=g5diBvPJGLpvhRxYcKOY8s3GWnEYALsJ3DFuBrtGfW4%3D&reserved=0>



The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1765/files<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1765%2Ffiles&data=04%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C874d6f5249d048cff1c108d9ebad5371%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637799952989261904%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=YIoWX0y4YV%2FLdEkeTm6MUSeNkWO15ylTxouKy54EFy0%3D&reserved=0>



Call minutes:

https://www.w3.org/2022/02/08-ag-minutes#t06<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2022%2F02%2F08-ag-minutes%23t06&data=04%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C874d6f5249d048cff1c108d9ebad5371%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637799952989261904%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=ZSRxD2Ii%2B5%2B6av8GpyfzeC9RwByEAX5I8rPwhiW2vSw%3D&reserved=0> and

https://www.w3.org/2022/02/01-ag-minutes#item08<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2022%2F02%2F01-ag-minutes%23item08&data=04%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C874d6f5249d048cff1c108d9ebad5371%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637799952989261904%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=u8wIt0fYZCf%2BD2LT7jPKmMcxQGEdQ7c%2B17VQ%2FJDVqhM%3D&reserved=0>



Survey:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc/results<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fwcag22-misc%2Fresults&data=04%7C01%7Cakirkpat%40adobe.com%7C874d6f5249d048cff1c108d9ebad5371%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637799952989261904%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=nQvHiiAv5jXgPtWbdIUewNzLBoQwuKQBPwL6FNcYI7U%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair