Re: CFC - Errata for WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported definition

+1

Kind regards,
Laura

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022, 11:33 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Monday January 10th at mid-day Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed a small change to a note on a definition:
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#h-note-43
>
>
>
> Whilst it is a small change, it is normative therefore we are going
> through the CFC process.
>
>
>
> It was raised in this issue:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1758
>
>
>
> Discussed and agreed in this meeting:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/01/04-ag-minutes.html#t06
>
>
>
> The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1777/files
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>
>
>