Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Redundant entry

+1
Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
Mobile:  613.806.9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 2:30 PM Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Laura
>
> On 6/6/22, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
> > Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time.
> >
> > The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant
> Entry
> > and it needs to be approved by CFC.
> >
> > It can be previewed in the editor’s draft:
> > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html
> >
> > The SC was last discussed Dec 3rd:
> > https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t24
> >
> > The change history is here:
> >
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/redundant-entry.html
> >
> > The surveys are available here:
> > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry/results and
> >
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry-updates/results
> >
> > The github issues (all closed) are listed here:
> >
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3A%223.3.8+Redundant+Entry%22+
> >
> > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being
> > able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the
> CfC
> > deadline.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > -Alastair
> > --
> >
> > @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
>