- From: Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 18:05:29 +0000
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 6 June 2022 18:05:47 UTC
+1 --- Best, Todd ------- Original Message ------- On Monday, June 6th, 2022 at 8:19 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time. > > The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant Entry and it needs to be approved by CFC. > > It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html > > The SC was last discussed Dec 3rd: > > https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t24 > > The change history is here: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/redundant-entry.html > > The surveys are available here: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry/results and > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry-updates/results > > The github issues (all closed) are listed here: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3A%223.3.8+Redundant+Entry%22+ > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > @alastc /www.nomensa.com
Received on Monday, 6 June 2022 18:05:47 UTC