Re: Focus-appearance updates

Ok, I’ve removed that from the PR.

Thanks,

-Alastair

From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
Date: Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 11:45
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Focus-appearance updates
Good point. Probably not, it's editorial. That's best done either in notes or in the understanding doc.

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:41 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote:
Hi Wilco,

Re-reading it, do we need the last sentence? I think we covered that in the previous one…

-Alastair


From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com<mailto:wilco.fiers@deque.com>>
Hey Alastair,
That last sentence "Links that break across multiple lines are not considered to have a larger perimeter.”, could we maybe do something like "This prevents the perimeter from increasing when a link wraps across multiple lines."?

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:59 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote:
Hi everyone,

We almost completed the 2nd question on focus-appearance:
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-enhanced2/results#xq54

The changes discussed are implemented in:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2420/files<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F2420%2Ffiles&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C1f61fe36d4d248cc7dd208da3e3bb24f%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637890723361606734%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bhNRiOy%2BLlXHnLuB4WifQA2eP0Y7sZCXYjHaHWyk35w%3D&reserved=0>

Which makes the end of the definition for perimeter:
“For components which wrap onto multiple lines as part of a sentence or block of text, the perimeter can be established based on how the link would appear on a single line (contiguously), if this perimeter is smaller. Links that break across multiple lines are not considered to have a larger perimeter.”

Does anyone have any concerns about that update?

The agreed changes from today can be seen in this PR:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2480/files<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F2480%2Ffiles&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C1f61fe36d4d248cc7dd208da3e3bb24f%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637890723361606734%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NASbB%2FJt%2Bh11VgDBal01P1P97TWZC%2FgjfpgL3dZtrgo%3D&reserved=0>

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>



--
Wilco Fiers
Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
Error! Filename not specified.



--
Wilco Fiers
Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
[cid:BCBD7D4B-677E-4B95-AE3F-60005DBD9EE4]