Re: Process for WCAG 3.0 document updates

I wasn't able to attend the meeting today because of the AC meeting, so 
thanks for sharing your presentation Alastair.


It seems like a reasonable approach towards making progress in a timely 
fashion.


On 12/10/2021 16:49, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Regarding the presentation I gave on our process & WCAG 3.0 document, 
> that presentation is here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1MRuvJ6BcLCPfupvvrwL6GU-KsyWR76Tb/edit#slide=id.p1 
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fpresentation%2Fd%2F1MRuvJ6BcLCPfupvvrwL6GU-KsyWR76Tb%2Fedit%23slide%3Did.p1&data=04%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C5d9e891b972e4ba6cb4308d98d2101ba%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637695995644406401%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=M93cH8vmMLNgQ1FZ9zzFlYbvUiT8IXON%2F2xKyN7nMgM%3D&reserved=0>
>
> The main point of the proposal is to change the expectation that the 
> entire document has consensus and is ‘recommendation ready’.
>
> You could consider the entire current Working Draft (WD) to be 
> ‘exploratory’, but we have internal (and probably external) confusion 
> about the intended maturity level of the document.
>
> The proposal is to apply labels to each section of the documents which 
> indicate the level of maturity, and have a level of review that each 
> section needs to get to for that level.
>
> The official Working Draft would have the more mature content, the 
> Editors Draft would include everything being worked on. Both would 
> have the labels.
>
> Meeting time is rather precious at the moment, we wanted to put this 
> proposal in front of everyone, get some feedback (here) for broader 
> points, and then have a survey/discussion.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> -- 
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com>
>
-- 
Director @TetraLogical
https://tetralogical.com