Re: CFC - Approving WCAG 3 Explainer for publication

+1

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>


From: Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 5:48 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Approving WCAG 3 Explainer for publication
Importance: High


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.


Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday September 15th at 10:00am Boston time.



The Working Group and Silver Taskforce approved sending the WCAG 3 Explainer document changes to CFC at the August 3rd meeting<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favanan.url-protection.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fo%3Dhttps%253A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F08%2F03-ag-minutes.html%2523item02%26g%3DM2M4OTE3ODI0Y2EzMmE0OA%3D%3D%26h%3DZWMzZmM4M2M1Y2RiNWYzMTFlMmMzYmNiZGM2OGMzOGNkMWEyYjU0N2E4ZTFlOTIzZWYxZDBkN2VlNDYwYWQxNw%3D%3D%26p%3DYXAxZTpzaXRlaW1wcm92ZS1ldTphdmFuYW46bzo1MDY3ODVkNDJhYmJmYWY2YmUwZGY5OTRjMmJiODBiMzp2MQ%3D%3D&data=04%7C01%7Cjcha%40siteimprove.com%7Cf77a400843584e49a65b08d97788a075%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C1%7C0%7C637672250983368989%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=9uO6BwLBCPqd2K2lNhFklgbHgj92A%2F6%2F0Ao12tT2JaA%3D&reserved=0> along with an editor’s note.



I emailed the text of the editor’s note<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favanan.url-protection.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fo%3Dhttps%253A%2F%2Flists.w3.org%2FArchives%2FPublic%2Fpublic-silver%2F2021Aug%2F0026.html%26g%3DMjg1MjdkMTAyMDRhMzBiOA%3D%3D%26h%3DMTIxMGFlOTdjMTgzYjQ4MDEzOWJlZTgyNDg2NTczYmIxNDg5OGZlMTQ2NTU2NDExZjg3OGVkYjg1MTVlYzhmNQ%3D%3D%26p%3DYXAxZTpzaXRlaW1wcm92ZS1ldTphdmFuYW46bzo1MDY3ODVkNDJhYmJmYWY2YmUwZGY5OTRjMmJiODBiMzp2MQ%3D%3D&data=04%7C01%7Cjcha%40siteimprove.com%7Cf77a400843584e49a65b08d97788a075%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C1%7C0%7C637672250983368989%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=cYOYcsDyengTlwRgngWPo8J0voB2T6nIiubRuNrcFqo%3D&reserved=0> out for any comment on August 10th and received no changes.  Since then we agreed during joint meetings not to include the guideline related updates so they have been removed from the editor’s note list of changes for this publication.



The resulting document can be previewed at https://rawgit.com/w3c/silver/Explainer_edits-js/explainer/<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favanan.url-protection.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fo%3Dhttps%253A%2F%2Frawgit.com%2Fw3c%2Fsilver%2FExplainer_edits-js%2Fexplainer%2F%26g%3DMzI4NGU2MGY1OTAwYjllOQ%3D%3D%26h%3DY2U4MGRhYTc5ZDAxMjg3OTAyZmNmNDNjNGExYjVkYTQ1Y2RiMTA3Y2YxNmFkNDA1NmNlYmMwZTk4NDViNmIzNQ%3D%3D%26p%3DYXAxZTpzaXRlaW1wcm92ZS1ldTphdmFuYW46bzo1MDY3ODVkNDJhYmJmYWY2YmUwZGY5OTRjMmJiODBiMzp2MQ%3D%3D&data=04%7C01%7Cjcha%40siteimprove.com%7Cf77a400843584e49a65b08d97788a075%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C1%7C0%7C637672250983378953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=6IPDWOoT1UZ2twJmwN%2FjulF1%2BKnv7eQoMNiCl3OIsiw%3D&reserved=0>



The pull request is at https://github.com/w3c/silver/pull/533<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favanan.url-protection.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fo%3Dhttps%253A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fsilver%2Fpull%2F533%26g%3DNzI4Zjg1NmMxZWEwMTYxNA%3D%3D%26h%3DMDdjMWEyYzUyYTA1MTk0ZTY2Y2U1OTdmYzVjNmM4NDViMjg2OTljMjA1ZjMwMzQwZTg1MzQ5NjhjZDQ1Yjc1ZA%3D%3D%26p%3DYXAxZTpzaXRlaW1wcm92ZS1ldTphdmFuYW46bzo1MDY3ODVkNDJhYmJmYWY2YmUwZGY5OTRjMmJiODBiMzp2MQ%3D%3D&data=04%7C01%7Cjcha%40siteimprove.com%7Cf77a400843584e49a65b08d97788a075%7Cad30e5bc301d40dba10a0e8d40abe0f9%7C1%7C0%7C637672250983378953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=0ecTwNApfOIgctyFY%2BT4cgFqcrjMrvvXN4kVMe3Zk0Q%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.


---
Rachael Bradley Montgomery, PhD
Digital Accessibility Specialist
Library of Congress
Email: rmontgomery@loc.gov<mailto:rmontgomery@loc.gov>