Re: Target Size (Min)

Anybody able to shed some more light into the question here 
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1689#issuecomment-801890761 and 
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1689#issuecomment-803378394 on 
whether or not (and how) the "spacing" is used when determining the 
"furthest point" of a target. Does the "furthest point" *include* 
spacing (i.e. you can consider the spacing itself to be the furthest 
edge)?  And if so, how does this not prevent super-small targets from 
being butted up close against each other as long as they have sufficient 
clearance on the other sides? And if that is indeed the intent, how is 
this understandable from the contorted language of the spacing exception?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2021 08:04:05 UTC