RE: CFC - Target Size (Min)

+1

Thx,

ND


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 10:09 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Target Size (Min)
Importance: High


Call For Consensus - ends 19th March at 3pm Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria "Target Size (Minimum)", formerly "Target spacing", the latest version can be seen here:

https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#target-size-minimum<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Fguidelines%2F22%2F%23target-size-minimum&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C30c02cf5e4ef4663abba08d8e9678fee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637515978307325095%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=991lZ2jvsIYwdAzLm%2B%2FYnrxpPhbtp32ewQbLGFttJlM%3D&reserved=0>



Survey of issues and responses:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-target-spacing-issues/results<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Fwcag22-target-spacing-issues%2Fresults&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C30c02cf5e4ef4663abba08d8e9678fee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637515978307335090%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VLQ2PEDJTHXgsQVyIsfrEiyQZa%2FcovtFuxoOu2y2Lt8%3D&reserved=0>



Previous minutes include:

https://www.w3.org/2021/03/09-ag-minutes.html#item12<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F03%2F09-ag-minutes.html%23item12&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C30c02cf5e4ef4663abba08d8e9678fee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637515978307345088%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=XhrhRHMRTz3%2BdW9%2F60qAKBUqb12Uv03fAoW%2BVFOvc4A%3D&reserved=0>

https://www.w3.org/2021/03/02-ag-minutes.html#item03<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F03%2F02-ag-minutes.html%23item03&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C30c02cf5e4ef4663abba08d8e9678fee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637515978307355083%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=lUddl5MGmxsff9WQUtokL%2FBD6IzDvbVn8YKoFY%2F8SPA%3D&reserved=0>

https://www.w3.org/2021/02/23-ag-minutes.html#item02<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2021%2F02%2F23-ag-minutes.html%23item02&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C30c02cf5e4ef4663abba08d8e9678fee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637515978307355083%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=cFy2VEDraOY1n1%2BgHeidtr4PS52TI0cCViyErxDIbNk%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cnidogbo%40microsoft.com%7C30c02cf5e4ef4663abba08d8e9678fee%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637515978307365079%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=9T%2FJzbQYkoYHiTzJBCosT%2FZES9g8eM3Hc5tk1OM4YHY%3D&reserved=0>