- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 01:10:15 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ac292f35-32d0-9521-2dcd-4df61c9dbb13@splintered.co.uk>
On 18/03/2021 00:18, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > Maybe the point of contention/that I'm not getting is that the SC tries > to account for the fact that the smaller the target is below 24x24, the > harder it is for a user to determine the center/where they want to > tap/click? It does seem (unless I'm getting myself confused), that the > smaller the target gets below 24x24, the larger the "exclusive > area"/spacing effectively becomes. Taking a 24x24 target, its overall > exclusive area is literally 24x24. At the extreme end, a 1x1 target > needs 23 px spacing on all sides, making its exclusive area 47x47 px. If > that's intentional, it should be very clearly spelled out as well and > diagrammed. See attached diagram. Also, in the second paragraph for "Intent" on https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/target-size-minimum.html "For example, a target of 20 x 20px would meet the requirement if it had a spacing of 2 px on all sides." Shouldn't this say "4px on all sides"? (and it basically telescopes out - the smaller the target size, the larger the spacing requirement) P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Attachments
- image/png attachment: target-size-minimum.png
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2021 01:10:30 UTC