Re: Findable help issues

Hi Alistair
Can we have a link to the current wording of the SC?
It might make more sense to me then...
All the best
Lisa

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:47 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> Last time we discussed Findable help, there were a couple of issues we
> couldn’t answer:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2020/12/01-ag-minutes.html#item03
>
>
>
> The resolution was to add some examples that try to answer the question.
> In doing so, we should be able to work out if the SC text will be testable.
>
> The problem was that "Consistent Navigation" doesn't require that
> navigation be shown on all pages in the set, only that where it does show,
> it must show consistently.
>
> I think this does put us under a burden of proof to show, either through
> examples or a definition update, how people can consistently identify
> whether any page is part of a set.
>
> If that is too difficult, it might be a case for deferment because in
> Silver the person claiming conformance defines the process/task/set.
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>