Re: CFC - color contrast formula errata

+1
JF

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:32 AM Charles Hall <hallmediamobile@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Charles Hall
>
> Senior Accessibility Designer
> Invited Expert, W3C AGWG & Silver TF
> Chair, W3C IDIW CG
> Member, Ferndale Accessibility & Inclusion Advisory Commission
>
> On May 13, 2021, at 5:29 AM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday May 17th at noon Boston time.
>
> The Working Group has discussed a change to the color contrast formula to
> update the dated reference to an old spec. It includes a note saying that
> it won’t affect the values generated from the formula. This change would
> add an errata to WCAG 2.0 & 2.1, and be included in 2.2.
>
> The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1780/files
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2021/05/11-ag-minutes.html#item07
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> --
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>

-- 
*John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"