- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 14:15:57 +0000
- To: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BL1PR03MB61203226D5078D2EB98D7672F1519@BL1PR03MB6120.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
+1 From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 5:30 AM To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: CFC - color contrast formula errata Importance: High CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Call For Consensus - ends Monday May 17th at noon Boston time. The Working Group has discussed a change to the color contrast formula to update the dated reference to an old spec. It includes a note saying that it won't affect the values generated from the formula. This change would add an errata to WCAG 2.0 & 2.1, and be included in 2.2. The specific changes are detailed in this pull request: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1780/files Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2021/05/11-ag-minutes.html#item07 If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2021 14:16:12 UTC