Re: [External] Redundant entry update

Alastair,
This looks good. I agree that security concerns are different from “essential” so I think that this is a good approach.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Director, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 1:13 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [External] Redundant entry update
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 at 1:13 PM

Hi everyone,

On the call we agreed to use version 2, with an update to the format of the exception.

I’d like to CFC it, but just before that can anyone spot any issues with this update:
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/wcag22-redundent-entry-security-note-alt/understanding/22/redundant-entry.html


NB: Focusing on the normative text, we’ll be updating the understanding doc separately.

If the exceptions are not bulleted, try a browser re-fresh.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>
tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT

Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411