- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:02:48 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 16/04/2021 11:26, Alastair Campbell wrote: > On the substance, I think that’s why it is a “mechanism is available” > SC. For an ePub doc being used in an ePub reader, there is no author > requirement (unless your accessibility support includes readers without > that functionality, and it’s available at a URL). > > However, the reason the EPUB folks wanted this was for browser-based > rendering of EPUB docs, where there is no in-built mechanism. So presumably, as with that recent discussion about bypass blocks, all that's needed is an extension being made available somewhere publicly to count as a mechanism... P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Friday, 16 April 2021 20:03:15 UTC