- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 20:41:14 -0400
- To: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEy-OxG2bPqg6iXXYgLDOLXVgkda1_74RoFo0sTwo_yfgrPPoQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, 6:22 PM Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 6, 2021 4:27 PM > *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* CFC - Focus appearance (min) SC > *Importance:* High > > > > *CAUTION:* This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > Call For Consensus — ends 9th April at noon Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 success criteria “Focus > Appearance (Minimum)”, the latest version can be seen here: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#focus-appearance-minimum > > > > Survey of issues and responses: > > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-focus-appearance-updates/results > > > > Previous minutes include: > > https://www.w3.org/2021/04/06-ag-minutes.html#t01 > > https://www.w3.org/2021/02/16-ag-minutes.html#item05 > > https://www.w3.org/2021/01/19-ag-minutes.html#t02 > > > > Note: We have discussed an alternative size measure, but agreed to raise > an issue during the next review period. > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com >
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2021 00:41:38 UTC