- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 09:59:36 +0000
- To: Richard Boardman <rboardman@salesforce.com>
- CC: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2021 09:59:52 UTC
Hi Rick, > 1. Typo (see CAPS). Also suggested simplification -> For each web page within a set of web pages that provides one or more of THE following ways of finding help, access to at least one form of help is included in the same relative order on each page". Note: I can live without the simplification though. The typo is corrected now, thank you. The suggestion would significantly change the scope of the SC, and would need discussion. I’m taking that as a ‘can live with the current text’ suggestion. > 2. I'm concerned that some non-experts may misinterpret a pass on this criteria as the help functionality itself being accessible. I think that is something best tackled in the understanding document. Conceptually you could say the same thing about the other two “Consistent…” SCs, and I’m not aware of that being an issue for them. For any SC, all the other SCs still apply, so it isn’t a problem with the normative text as such. WCAG 2.2 is going for another round of reviews, so if you’d like to contribute changes to the understanding doc, or raise issues, there will be time for that. Kind regards, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2021 09:59:52 UTC