- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:59:20 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 24/09/2020 03:02, David MacDonald wrote: > I think the concern was that devs might reduce the actual target size to > meet the spacing+target requirements. > I don't think their usability personnel will let targets get too small. > > What if we leave it out there for another draft round and see what comes > back? Considering that for web content, users can always zoom to increase target size if they do find it too small (and other SCs should guarantee that authors don't block zooming, reflow content, etc), I'd tend towards dropping this SC to be honest. But yes, see what comes back... P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke -- Inclusive Design 24 (#id24) https://inclusivedesign24.org
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2020 07:59:35 UTC