Re: CFC - Add "Pointer target spacing" to WCAG 2.2 draft

Can I add a late +1

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020, 4:25 PM David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Hi All
> I think it's fine for public review... but there is something that seems
> inconsistent... The basic requirement is for a 44px square area which
> includes the target.  But the first bullet exception says that there is a
> mechanism to set the *target* to 44 px not the aria that *includes* the
> target
>
> CURRENT TEXT OF THE BULLET
> Enlarge: A mechanism is available to change the CSS pixel size of all
> targets so that the width and height are each at least 44 CSS pixels;
>
> I think that first bullet should instead say that the mechanism can
> produce the basic requirement which is a 44px area that CONTAINS the
> content rather than the target is IS 44px
>
> SUGGESTED TEXT
> Enlarge: A mechanism is available to provide, for each target, an area
> with a width and height of at least 44 CSS pixels that includes it, and no
> other active targets;
>
> Cheers,
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613-806-9005
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:33 PM Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no
>> responses indicating that group members could not live with this decision,
>> this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.
>>
>>
>>
>> This decision will be recorded at
>> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!PAfe-XrsFxUH4dZL_FX19s4zZzyQOuZYCKyCtr86gjdjeTZC-aJbQHTdG80jEJPvhw$>
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Charles Adams
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2020 5:29 PM
>> *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* CFC - Add "Pointer target spacing" to WCAG 2.2 draft
>> *Importance:* High
>>
>>
>>
>> Call For Consensus — ends Monday 20th  July at midday Boston time.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Working Group has discussed adding “Pointer Target Spacing” to the
>> WCAG 2.2 draft:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2020/04/14-ag-minutes.html#item05
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2020/04/14-ag-minutes.html*item05__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kj4CYuv10KtafXYD_wSpfWoMgLWdI4M1az8uypM8Gn-N0TN9dssLp3H_T--aTWSN_w$>
>>
>> And some more recent updates:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2020/07/14-ag-minutes.html#item02
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2020/07/14-ag-minutes.html*item02__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kj4CYuv10KtafXYD_wSpfWoMgLWdI4M1az8uypM8Gn-N0TN9dssLp3H_T-_NLIRm3w$>
>>
>>
>>
>> The specific changes (including rendered SC and understanding doc) are
>> detailed in this pull request:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1179
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1179__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kj4CYuv10KtafXYD_wSpfWoMgLWdI4M1az8uypM8Gn-N0TN9dssLp3H_T-9BCuPxlA$>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
>> the CfC deadline.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> www.nomensa.com
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Kj4CYuv10KtafXYD_wSpfWoMgLWdI4M1az8uypM8Gn-N0TN9dssLp3H_T-8M2WnqdA$>
>> / @alastc
>>
>>
>>
>