RE: CFC - Add "Error correction (Processes)" to WCAG 2.2 draft

-1

I remain concerned with the scope of the exceptions in the current text, and I would prefer to have the language adjusted to include "essential to the activity". It seems that we are missing the mark on some legitimate exceptions that are not covered with the latest wording. I do not think that we need to remove the current exceptions as much as add a clarification that scope includes scenarios that fall into the "essential" category.

Best,
Justine

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 5:51 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: RE: CFC - Add "Error correction (Processes)" to WCAG 2.2 draft
Importance: High

Apologies, that was the wrong PR link, it should be:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1157<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1157&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540028847&sdata=jtqO%2BOk6QzJyu6uPmCPcKTNZNaWu27JEXPDbUaYDTUQ%3D&reserved=0>


From: Alastair Campbell


Call For Consensus - ends Wednesday July 15th at midday Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed adding the new SC "Error correction (Processes)" to the WCAG 2.2 draft:

https://www.w3.org/2020/03/25-ag-minutes.html#item03<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2020%2F03%2F25-ag-minutes.html%23item03&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540028847&sdata=d3y5bvaHRbrp65DPhFPypUheLUDzgWDOYBO2kjc%2B7%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>



The changes, preview of the documents, and survey link are detailed in this pull request:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1046<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1046&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540038841&sdata=jce6Q7NL4o2gWUxzLv0AClEY2CXRLAl%2BxpggyByttRM%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540048833&sdata=h5n8AdbjK20hVzqbMWoIzchT%2B%2B7k10qrhdbtoEcXVCU%3D&reserved=0> / @alastc


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________