- From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:56:22 +0200
- To: Rachael Bradley Montgomery <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMpCG4GB3D_un3-wx8kVfxCgJARJqrZXQHhadUYaaAQ+AWw09g@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Op di 14 jul. 2020 om 16:55 schreef Rachael Bradley Montgomery < rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>: > +1 > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 5:20 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Justine, >> >> >> >> For this bullet: >> >> “A mechanism is available for reviewing, confirming, and correcting >> information before finalizing the submission, unless the information cannot >> be modified for logical, security, or privacy reasons." [1] >> >> >> >> I think we had discussed using “essential” before, and from what I >> remember “logical” wouldn’t fit under our current definition of essential. >> That was intended for things like changing the destination of a holiday, >> which would mean the hotel & flight would not (logically) be valid any >> more. Not essential (by our functionality-focused definition), but not >> valid either. >> >> >> >> For the next button aspect, it is based on the definition of ‘process’, >> so the bullets need to be true before you finish the ‘activity’. >> >> >> >> However, it isn’t really about what buttons are used, it is about what >> information is entered, and having a mechanism to review / confirm / >> correct. >> >> >> >> That could be at any stage up to the final submission, it doesn’t require >> that it is at the final step. For example, you might go back 3 steps to >> review or edit something, then progress again. >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >> >> >> 1] Preview of the SC & understanding: >> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/wcag22-error-correction/understanding/22/error-correction-processes.html >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Pascalides, Justine >> >> >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> An exception to the SC is implied with the current verbiage. It seems to >> me that explicitly calling out the exception (i.e., “unless essential to >> the activity”) would align with the presentation of exceptions in other >> success criteria – which would cover the logical, security, privacy, and >> other valid reasons where an exception might be applicable. >> >> >> >> Does the use of a “Next” button within a process constitute a submission? >> If buttons used to advance but not complete a process are out of scope, >> perhaps explicitly mentioning that would be helpful in defining a >> “submission” for purposes of this SC. >> >> >> >> Justine >> >> >> >> *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> >> *Sent:* Friday, July 10, 2020 5:51 AM >> *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> >> *Subject:* RE: CFC - Add "Error correction (Processes)" to WCAG 2.2 draft >> *Importance:* High >> >> >> >> Apologies, that was the wrong PR link, it should be: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1157 >> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1157&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540028847&sdata=jtqO%2BOk6QzJyu6uPmCPcKTNZNaWu27JEXPDbUaYDTUQ%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Alastair Campbell >> >> >> >> Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday July 15th at midday Boston time. >> >> >> >> The Working Group has discussed adding the new SC “Error correction >> (Processes)” to the WCAG 2.2 draft: >> >> https://www.w3.org/2020/03/25-ag-minutes.html#item03 >> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2020%2F03%2F25-ag-minutes.html%23item03&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540028847&sdata=d3y5bvaHRbrp65DPhFPypUheLUDzgWDOYBO2kjc%2B7%2Fo%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> The changes, preview of the documents, and survey link are detailed in >> this pull request: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1046 >> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1046&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540038841&sdata=jce6Q7NL4o2gWUxzLv0AClEY2CXRLAl%2BxpggyByttRM%3D&reserved=0> >> >> >> >> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not >> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not >> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before >> the CfC deadline. >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> www.nomensa.com >> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7Ccd582c94933c405cf7be08d824b6bba0%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C637299714540048833&sdata=h5n8AdbjK20hVzqbMWoIzchT%2B%2B7k10qrhdbtoEcXVCU%3D&reserved=0> >> / @alastc >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or >> confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom >> it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail >> in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or >> take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete >> it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. >> >> >> >> Thank you for your compliance. >> ------------------------------ >> > > > -- > Rachael Montgomery, PhD > Director, Accessible Community > rachael@accessiblecommunity.org > > "I will paint this day with laughter; > I will frame this night in song." > - Og Mandino > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 July 2020 14:56:47 UTC