Re: Selectable treeview interaction question

PS ignore CFC in the thread. I was just stealing the email address and 
meant to delete that!
Michael Gower
Senior Consultant in Accessibility
IBM Design


1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC  V8T 5C3
gowerm@ca.ibm.com
cellular: (250) 661-0098 *  fax: (250) 220-8034



From:   Michael Gower/CanWest/IBM
To:     "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc:     Carolyn MacLeod/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Date:   2020/07/10 01:26 PM
Subject:        Selectable treeview interaction question


I'm helping a team design and plan interaction for a variety of treeview 
implementations.
I had a question for the group around keyboard operation for multi-select 
treeviews.

The 1.2 aria practice guide, 
https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-practices-1.2/#TreeView,  gives quite a bit 
of information, but it is a little light on the function of Enter versus 
Spacebar in regards to expected behaviour.
Simply put, in a more complex interaction where activations and/or 
selections in the treeview cause other views to update, what challenges 
are faced by making Spacebar only be a method of selection/deselection, 
with Enter being assigned an activation role?

I'd welcome any stories or examples folks can provide. Ones I've 
encountered so far include:
- feature selection during an application installation
- an explorer-like UI, where the activating a node in the treeview updates 
the view in the different view (frame, pane, etc), while selecting one of 
more nodes in the true provides an ability to carry out an action against 
the selected item(s), such as delete.

Thanks for any thoughts/considerations. I'm particularly interested in 
issues caused by OS differences (and how to overcome them). For instance, 
my understanding is that in some such interactions, OSX applications will 
use Enter as the select and spacebar as activation-- the complete opposite 
of what what I'd consider the 'normal' experience.

Michael Gower
Senior Consultant in Accessibility
IBM Design


1803 Douglas Street, Victoria, BC  V8T 5C3
gowerm@ca.ibm.com
cellular: (250) 661-0098 *  fax: (250) 220-8034




From:   Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
To:     "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Date:   2020/06/25 04:01 AM
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] CFC - Add Findable help to WCAG 2.2 draft



Call For Consensus — ends Monday June 24th at 11:59 Boston time.
 
The Working Group has discussed the new Success Criteria for WCAG 2.2: 
Findable Help.
 
The Pull Request in github shows the changes, and includes links to 
preview the additional SC, the understanding document, and the technique: 
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1158 
 
The last call was:  https://www.w3.org/2020/06/23-ag-minutes.html#item02
 
The last survey: 
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/findable-help-finalisation/results

 
If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not 
been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not 
being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before 
the CfC deadline.
 
Kind regards,
 
-Alastair
 
-- 
 
www.nomensa.com / @alastc