+1
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:59 AM Newton, Brooks (TR Product) <
Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> Brooks
>
>
>
> *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 7, 2020 9:44 AM
> *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CFC - Add "Redundant entry" to WCAG 2.2 draft
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday July 10th at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed adding the new SC “Redundant entry” to the
> WCAG 2.2 draft:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2020/02/18-ag-minutes.html#item02
>
>
>
> The changes, preview of the documents, and survey link are detailed in
> this pull request:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1046
> <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1046&data=02%7C01%7CBrooks.Newton%40thomsonreuters.com%7Cd5ab3cea095b4c0d854d08d822845797%7C62ccb8646a1a4b5d8e1c397dec1a8258%7C0%7C0%7C637297299089846324&sdata=JBV3NiNPGDd2fVfO3ulj5QEgjlDvLJZ1s1MrF712iHQ%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> www.nomensa.com
> <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7CBrooks.Newton%40thomsonreuters.com%7Cd5ab3cea095b4c0d854d08d822845797%7C62ccb8646a1a4b5d8e1c397dec1a8258%7C0%7C0%7C637297299089846324&sdata=8YnhM%2FUTej%2FCN5a0hiVpYj4Fv9CCqIs9%2FdbXlgrUaj0%3D&reserved=0>
> / @alastc
>
>
>