RE: CFC - Add Accessible Authentication to WCAG 2.2 draft

+1

John

John Rochford
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Center
Director, INDEX Program
Faculty, Family Medicine & Community Health
www.DisabilityInfo.org
About Me<https://johnrochford.com/?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=edit_panel&utm_content=plaintext>
Schedule a meeting with me.<http://bit.ly/CallJR>

Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary, and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy or permanently delete all copies of the original message.

From: jake abma <jake.abma@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2020 7:23 AM
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Cc: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC - Add Accessible Authentication to WCAG 2.2 draft

+1

Op do 19 mrt. 2020 om 11:00 schreef Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>:
Call For Consensus - ends Monday March 23rd  at 9am Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed the new Success Criteria for WCAG 2.2: Accessible Authentication.



The Pull Request in github shows the changes, and includes links to preview the additional SC, the understanding document, and the technique:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1037<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F1037&data=02%7C01%7Cjohn.rochford%40umassmed.edu%7Cf6d75607197b4578a24208d7ce5377ee%7Cee9155fe2da34378a6c44405faf57b2e%7C0%7C0%7C637204730206390620&sdata=18TpjL04kH%2F%2FjUgV%2FOhpqRW3%2FoRHVUbo6YiYMUhdZHU%3D&reserved=0>



This was discussed via a survey:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/accessible-auth/results<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2Faccessible-auth%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7Cjohn.rochford%40umassmed.edu%7Cf6d75607197b4578a24208d7ce5377ee%7Cee9155fe2da34378a6c44405faf57b2e%7C0%7C0%7C637204730206400613&sdata=zPfWLwmrLtXQ1aWWwWtIUk1Kh3%2BoaGPVNUk0%2B%2BUpYlw%3D&reserved=0>

And the last call was:

https://www.w3.org/2020/01/14-ag-minutes.html#item08<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2020%2F01%2F14-ag-minutes.html%23item08&data=02%7C01%7Cjohn.rochford%40umassmed.edu%7Cf6d75607197b4578a24208d7ce5377ee%7Cee9155fe2da34378a6c44405faf57b2e%7C0%7C0%7C637204730206410614&sdata=7gd0OPvwmiK1IW6svuDcJFhNsWBcjt9eYAy34OLvIMw%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjohn.rochford%40umassmed.edu%7Cf6d75607197b4578a24208d7ce5377ee%7Cee9155fe2da34378a6c44405faf57b2e%7C0%7C0%7C637204730206410614&sdata=fSZC47oadC6SK%2BcBy%2FN1NOsrc1bYdNpXNPs4GXCqNmU%3D&reserved=0><http://www.nomensa.com/<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjohn.rochford%40umassmed.edu%7Cf6d75607197b4578a24208d7ce5377ee%7Cee9155fe2da34378a6c44405faf57b2e%7C0%7C0%7C637204730206420607&sdata=k%2B4p7ZnU33dgtz2B8NwtenLetCbK15Q8ffIhhwzj3Po%3D&reserved=0>> / @alastc