Re: CFC - Publication of WCAG 2.2 FPWD

+1 to the new WCAG 2.2
I was a little disappointed that we couldn't get to an accessible
authentication. It is difficult.

Someday I'd like to see reflow move to level A. It is achieved with 10-year
old technology, and it is so essential to reading.

Best, Wayne

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 5:24 AM Hall, Charles (DET-MRM) <
Charles.Hall@mrm-mccann.com> wrote:

> +1 to moving 2.2 to FPWD.
>
> I agree with other comments about drawing more attention to the 2.4.7 move
> from AA to A. Perhaps that can be done in the Introduction » §5 Comparison
> with 2.1 section, but comments from a larger audience seem fine.
>
>
>
> *Charles Hall* // Senior UX Architect
>
> Invited Expert, W3C Accessibility Guidelines Working Group & Silver Task
> Force
>
> Learning Ambassador, MRM//McCann
>
> Member, Global Diversity Coalition, McCann Worldgroup
>
>
>
> (he//him)
>
> charles.hall@mrm-mccann.com
>
> W +1.248.203.8723
>
> M +1.248.225.8179
>
> 360 W Maple, Birmingham MI 48009
>
> mrm-mccann.com <https://www.mrm-mccann.com/>
>
>
>
> [image: MRM//McCann]
>
> Cannes Network of the Year
>
> Effie’s Most Creatively Effective Global Network 2018, 2019
>
> Adweek 2019 Global Agency of the Year
>
> IPG Agency Inclusion Vanguard – Agency of the Year 2019
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 9:49 AM
> *To: *'WCAG list' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] CFC - Publication of WCAG 2.2 FPWD
> *Resent-From: *<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, February 4, 2020 at 9:47 AM
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday 6th February at 11am Boston time.
>
>
>
> This call is to approve the publication of WCAG 2.2 as the First Public
> Working Draft.
>
>
>
> The current draft is available here:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/
>
>
>
> The approach for WCAG 2.2 is to add only the items that have been agreed,
> and so far the Working Group has agreed to include Focus Visible (Enhanced)
> to the WCAG 2.2 working draft:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2020JanMar/0000.html
>
>
>
> Future decisions / CFCs would add more to the working draft, but this CFC
> is about permission to publish this first version.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> www.nomensa.com / @alastc
> This message contains information which may be confidential and
> privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
> this message for the intended recipient), you may not use, copy,
> disseminate or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained
> in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise
> the sender by reply e-mail, and delete the message. Thank you very much.
>