Re: Editorial clean up of SC Target Size

But for 44s, the spacing is not needed, it's for the ones smaller

Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> downloaden
________________________________
From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 4:44:42 PM
To: Abma, J.D. (Jake) <Jake.Abma@ing.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; AGWG Chairs <group-ag-chairs@w3.org>; Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
Subject: Re: Editorial clean up of SC Target Size

The AAA needs 44px by 44px square, on this one its only one side , the side of the adjacency...


Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 7:04 AM Abma, J.D. (Jake) <Jake.Abma@ing.com<mailto:Jake.Abma@ing.com>> wrote:

Hi David,

And how do see this in relation to Success Criterion 2.5.5 Target Size?
For the AAA 44x44, targets can be adjacent to each other without a problem, no need for spacing, now the AA is a show stopper without the mentioning of the 44 CSS px.

Cheers,
Jake

________________________________
From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca<mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 7:33 PM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>; AGWG Chairs <group-ag-chairs@w3.org<mailto:group-ag-chairs@w3.org>>; Abma, J.D. (Jake) <Jake.Abma@ing.com<mailto:Jake.Abma@ing.com>>; Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de<mailto:detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>>
Subject: Editorial clean up of SC Target Size

Hi All

I had an action item to try to make the current target size proposal easier to understand
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ejG_7yaCI2xbEPqFZCbJgqGuu_kplEMtsO-XYJVbTkg/edit?usp=sharing

It seems to me that the mention of 44px was unnecessary since the SC was really wanting to ensure 52 px between the start of one control and the start of another.


Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users

            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENTION:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENTION:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------