W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2019

Re: WCAG 2.2 COGA SC Persistent Labels Ready For Review Edits

From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:43:50 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAdDpDaTX9T1E-byeMCsr3W9D8QzQ6DcvEdUJ5Ao6nMPi8TV3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>
Cc: EA Draffan <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "lwatson@tetralogical.com" <lwatson@tetralogical.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi All

In the Google doc I made an attempt at writing the SC using WCAG defined
terms, including the "Conformance Requirement #3 on "steps in a process".
Here it is below for convenience.

For user interface components
<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-user-interface-components> that collect
information from the user, and which are part of a process
<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-processes> (i.e., a sequence of steps
that need to be completed in order to accomplish an activity), the
following are true:


   Information entered by the user remains available to the user throughout
   the entire process.

   Subsequent instances of completed fields are auto-populated, unless
   re-entry is essential <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#dfn-essential>.

   Labels or instructions are available throughout the process.

David MacDonald

*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005



GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>

*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:55 PM David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:

> Oops. I didn't attach the doc earlier. Here it is
> On 11/11/19, 12:54 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:
>     Attached is a Word Doc draft of proposed COGA success criteria
> Persistent Labels. It begins on page 8 of the Word Doc. As with Information
> In Steps, I kept everything in one document so everyone could see the
> evolution of the split. If you want to review, and edit, via Google Docs it
> begins on page 9. You can access the draft at this link:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e46eqQnVYqdSyqo29pyJoY1QynRH9v95YW8soTTbfsU/edit?ts=5d846669
> .
>     All comments, and recommendations are welcome.
>     On 11/10/19, 12:37 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com> wrote:
>         Thank you for the review, and edits, EA. I just implemented them.
> Information in Steps should be ready to go. I will finish up Persistent
> Labels later today, and send it out in the same document
>         On 11/5/19, 5:47 AM, "EA Draffan" <ead@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>             Thanks so much David and I am returning the document with a
> few queries and I have to admit that I found the alternative easier to
> understand.
>             That is
>             "Information provided to or obtained from a user in a
> multi-step process does not need to be re-entered in a subsequent step
> unless re-entry is essential [or required to ensure the security of the
> content)"
>             Best wishes
>             E.A.
>             Mrs E.A. Draffan
>             WAIS, ECS , University of Southampton
>             Mobile +44 (0)7976 289103
>             http://access.ecs.soton.ac.uk
>             -----Original Message-----
>             From: David Fazio [mailto:dfazio@helixopp.com]
>             Sent: 03 November 2019 21:26
>             To: lwatson@tetralogical.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org;
> public-cognitive-a11y-tf <public-cognitive-a11y-tf@w3.org>
>             Subject: Re: WCAG 2.2 COGA SC Information in Steps Ready For
> Review Edits
>             For everyone that prefers to review this S.C. in a word doc, I
> made some edits to the Understanding Document online. Here is the revised
> Word Doc.
>             On 11/3/19, 12:04 PM, "David Fazio" <dfazio@helixopp.com>
> wrote:
>                 Sure thing. I've attached the word doc
>                 On 11/3/19, 11:56 AM, "Léonie Watson" <
> lwatson@tetralogical.com> wrote:
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2019 17:44:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:32 UTC