RE: CFC - WCAG 2.2 requirements document

To clarify, the minor editorial suggestion for section 3 is to further expound the meaning of the text by adding an example such as:


  *   Example: WCAG 2.2 conformance entails conformance to previous iterations of WCAG including 2.0 and 2.1

Justine Pascalides

From: Pascalides, Justine E
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2019 10:14 AM
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: RE: CFC - WCAG 2.2 requirements document

+1

Note: a minor suggestion to clarify the meaning of the text in section 3

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 6:10 AM
To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: CFC - WCAG 2.2 requirements document


Call For Consensus — ends Friday 19th July at 12pm (midday) Boston time.



This CFC is for approval of the WCAG 2.2 requirements document.

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/master/requirements/22/index.html<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fmaster%2Frequirements%2F22%2Findex.html&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7C9d4f459f0cef443a0b7608d70a9f0e90%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636989550586825902&sdata=Rs5RFO8RyKsLUPKBC%2FrXjY25uqHrh4MFUxH8seA3q%2Fk%3D&reserved=0>



The Working Group has discussed the document several times, most recently using a survey:

https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/22requirements-2/results<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F35422%2F22requirements-2%2Fresults&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7C9d4f459f0cef443a0b7608d70a9f0e90%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636989550586835911&sdata=Sv8olyiS9BxDfWCiYlsURIXjWXUhsIn6CtoRwpsfPTE%3D&reserved=0>

And during a teleconference:

https://www.w3.org/2019/06/18-ag-minutes.html#item06<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F06%2F18-ag-minutes.html%23item06&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7C9d4f459f0cef443a0b7608d70a9f0e90%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636989550586845919&sdata=oCitQ1JGRcaAweLDFiU%2B3qble7IXkI46VWz%2F9%2B7c4oI%3D&reserved=0>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

www.nomensa.com<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjpascalides%40ets.org%7C9d4f459f0cef443a0b7608d70a9f0e90%7C0ba6e9b760b34fae92f37e6ddd9e9b65%7C0%7C0%7C636989550586845919&sdata=nmV4c3%2BOVV8y1gtXv2p843oBnnN%2FsM4%2Fyvlz34l8qFs%3D&reserved=0> / @alastc


________________________________

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.


Thank you for your compliance.

________________________________