Re: CFC - ACT Rules format 1.0

Thanks all. The editorial changes David pointed out have been sorted.

W

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 3:23 PM Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> +1 to CFC with David’s editorial corrections.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Head of Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>
>
> *From: *David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
> *Date: *Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM
> *To: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Cc: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Re: CFC - ACT Rules format 1.0
> *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 4:46 PM
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> Here are a few editorial suggestions, I think in general it needs a full
> read for grammar. Here's a couple I noticed in a quick read.
>
>
>
> Note a typo in section 3.1 example 3
>
>
>
> MUST NOST
> should be "MUST NOT"
>
>
>
> 4.8
>
> Example of a  rule that checks if aria-errormessage is used <add>to</add>
> satisfy WCAG 2.1 success criterion 4.1.3 Status messages :
>
>
>
> *Recommendation*
>
> 4.7
> "...If there are no test targets, the outcome for the rule is
> inapplicable ...."
>
>
> I suggest the term "not applicable" (or "nonapplicable" rather than
> "inapplicable" so the common short form "N/A" can be used.
>
> https://textranch.com/145717/is-not-applicable/or/is-inapplicable/
>
> https://wikidiff.com/nonapplicable/inapplicable
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> David MacDonald
>
>
>
> *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*
>
> Tel:  613-806-9005
>
> LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
>
> twitter.com/davidmacd
>
> GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
>
> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
>
>
>
> *  Adapting the web to all users*
>
> *            Including those with disabilities*
>
>
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
> <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:11 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> wrote:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday 19th at 2pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed the publication of the ACT Rules format
> 1.0, transitioning from Candidate Recommendation to Proposed Recommendation.
>
>
>
> This call is for approval of publishing the Rules Format 1.0.
>
>
>
> ACT Rules Format editors' draft:
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html
>
> Diff between editors' draft and CR:
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2019%2FCR-act-rules-format-1.0-20190416%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag-act%2Fact-rules-format.html
>
> Implementation report:
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-implementations.html
>
>
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2019/07/16-ag-minutes.html#item01
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> www.nomensa.com / @alastc
>
>

-- 
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe product owner - Co-facilitator WCAG-ACT - Chair ACT-R / Auto-WCAG