Re: Essential Controls

 > I believe this is valid as long as the top
 > level is visible.

Hmm. If the intent is that the controls a user is likely to want or need 
to use are not off the viewport then isn't a control hidden under 
another collapsible control equally bad?

Perhaps it can be mitigated if the presence of the child hidden control 
can be easily deduced - but that's another can of worms

eg the Cognitive Pattern - Sub-menu items are able to easily identify
https://www.w3.org/TR/coga-usable/#pattern-sub-menu-items-are-able-to-easily-identify 


Steve

On 18/07/2019 20:30, Rachael Bradley Montgomery wrote:
> David,
> 
> "Where does that place hamburger menus which are common and contain many 
> navigation links under them? "
> 
> Most menu's include collapsed content within them, the hamburger menu is 
> just an extreme example. I believe this is valid as long as the top 
> level is visible. It is a similar situation with an actions menu in many 
> process applications. I think that is more clear further down in the 
> document, but I have really struggled to capture that as long as the 
> control's top level is visible, the lower levels are valid within the SC 
> text. Any suggestions on how to incorporate that into the wording?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rachael
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 3:24 PM David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca 
> <mailto:david100@sympatico.ca>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Rachael
> 
>     > Controls needed to navigate content and to initiate, progress or complete a process are visible without scrolling or using a pointer-hover when it is possible to progress,
> 
>     Where does that place hamburger menus which are common and contain
>     many navigation links under them?
> 
>     Cheers,
>     David MacDonald
> 
>     *Can**Adapt**Solutions Inc.*
> 
>     Tel:  613-806-9005
> 
>     LinkedIn
>     <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>
> 
>     twitter.com/davidmacd <http://twitter.com/davidmacd>
> 
>     GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>
> 
>     www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>
> 
>     /  Adapting the web to *all* users/
> 
>     /            Including those with disabilities/
> 
>     If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy
>     policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
> 
> 
>     On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:51 PM Rachael Bradley Montgomery
>     <rachael@accessiblecommunity.org
>     <mailto:rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>> wrote:
> 
>         Hello,
> 
>         Based on feedback from the AG working group and the COGA task
>         force, I revised the2.2 SC Proposal for Essential Controls
>         <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DPtCqWHjrhj3QZ4afsqzmWDd-zMSf39RsMqSpR2QGCg/edit#heading=h.4vsa10j1zo6f>. 
>         If you have time, I'd appreciate further comments and
>         suggestions from the group.
> 
>         Best regards,
> 
>         Rachael
> 
>         -- 
>         Rachael Montgomery, PhD
>         Director, Accessible Community
>         rachael@accessiblecommunity.org
>         <mailto:rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rachael Montgomery, PhD
> Director, Accessible Community
> rachael@accessiblecommunity.org <mailto:rachael@accessiblecommunity.org>
> 
>

Received on Friday, 19 July 2019 10:36:38 UTC