Re: CFC - Focus for Working Group

To clarify: I would vote +1 if we had consensus on requirements and a
project plan of some sort in place. We have the work for more, but we need
clear agreement on what we'll work on and how we'll work on it. A more
easing transition would probably work better so we can focus on structure
and process before all-hands-on-deck writing kicks off, but I've only
really just entered this conversation and don't need to derail this thread,
since Jeanne and I didn't take part in the conversations leading up to this
call for consensus (I just happened to see it go by in my email).

As such, for now: -1.

-Shawn

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 10:36 AM Detlev Fischer <detlev.fischer@testkreis.de>
wrote:

> -1
> in the light of Shawn's comment, which I understand to express that the
> Silver TF thinks it needs more time before so much if the WG focus should
> be on Silver. It then seems sensible to focus more on WCAG 2.2 and the
> Techniques and wait for Silver to come and indicate when they want more
> involvement, beyond updating the WG regularly (happy to turn this into  +1
> if I misunderstood).
>
> Am 19.02.2019 um 21:32 schrieb Andrew Kirkpatrick:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday February 22nd at 3:30pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed how to focus the efforts of the group over
> the next 12-24 months and the proposal is that the WG can address the
> short-term need for improvements to Techniques and Understanding and begin
> to ramp-up work within the Working Group on Silver as well as commit to a
> WCAG 2.2, which will avoid the possibility of a large gap in time between
> the June 2018 WCAG 2.1 and Silver reaching Rec.
>
>
>
> *Proposed Schedule*
> March 2019-April 2019: 45% Techniques and Understanding, 45% Silver, 10%
> WCAG 2.2 (most drafting of new SC in ad hoc groups or TFs)
> May 2019-forward: 45% WCAG 2.2, 45% Silver, 10% Techniques and
> Understanding maintenance
>
>
>
> Survey: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/WCAG22_yesno/results
>
>
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2019/02/19-ag-minutes.html#item11
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Head of Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Detlev Fischer
> Testkreis
> Werderstr. 34, 20144 Hamburg
>
> Mobil +49 (0)157 57 57 57 45
> http://www.testkreis.de
> Beratung, Tests und Schulungen für barrierefreie Websites
>
>