- From: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 15:27:07 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> But yes, lacking the ability to programmatically query "which event listeners are registered on this page/element", the only solution at the moment would be to scour any referenced JS files or <script> elements, and take the presence of any of those strings as a flag for manual checking. Or do some monkey testing sending keystrokes to the page and different focused controls. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> Sent: Monday, February 4, 2019 6:26 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: Automatied testing options for 2.1.4 Character key Shortcuts and 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 17/01/2019 13:31, Detlev Fischer wrote: [...] > SC 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation > > A possibly automated check would look for functions on a page that > trigger actions on "down events" (mousedown, touchdown Also include pointerdown event. But yes, lacking the ability to programmatically query "which event listeners are registered on this page/element", the only solution at the moment would be to scour any referenced JS files or <script> elements, and take the presence of any of those strings as a flag for manual checking. P -- Patrick H. Lauke www.splintered.co.uk | https://github.com/patrickhlauke http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | http://redux.deviantart.com twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 4 February 2019 15:27:30 UTC