- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 16:15:42 +0000
- To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 16:16:06 UTC
So we have some examples which appear to rule-out a “any non-reflowing pre is a fail”, as there are essential uses of formatting that also encode meaning. (More examples are still welcome.) However, the field is still very open for sufficient techniques which show non-essential examples being done in a way that reflows (such as the pre-wrap for code examples). Having those examples should make clear that using pre doesn’t mean you necessarily avoid the reflow SC. -Alastair
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2019 16:16:06 UTC