On 28/06/2019 17:01, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > My personal preference would be to patch in tighter requirements > directly on the SC itself, instead of having to do weird extra-specific > SCs that overlap almost entirely except for one or two > clarifications/tightenings (provided we can resolve the possible > understanding/techniques doc mismatch, as already discussed in this thread) Emphatic +1 to this. > > P -- @TetraLogical TetraLogical.comReceived on Friday, 28 June 2019 16:28:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 21:08:30 UTC