- From: David MacDonald <david100@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 20:26:05 -0400
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAdDpDb=otSnsKR6G+jSG0a6tU6KXvfwj+ZkNPCwC2Oq6QaORQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613-806-9005 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:05 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > With a small note about assumptions as I’ve been reading the document in > one way and discovered other people might have been reading it differently. > (One person anyway.) > > > > Specifically for conformance, the introduction says: > > “Silver builds on the WCAG 2.0 Requirements of 2006.” (which includes > conformance) > > “Silver wishes to advance the WCAG 2.0 Requirements of” (which includes > “clear conformance”) > > > > Then it specifies which requirements it does not wish to ‘advance’. > > > > My interpretation is that a conformance model that meets **similar** > goals to WCAG 2.0 is a requirement of Silver. The WCAG 2.0 version ( > https://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-req/) does not use the same terminology that > Silver would use, but I’m assuming that when the conformance model is > fleshed out it will be incorporated as a requirement in Silver terms. > > > > I only add this as I was speaking to someone yesterday who had assumed > differently, so I wanted to be clear about the +1. > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Alastair > > > > > > *From: *Andrew Kirkpatrick > > > > Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday, May 14th at 11am Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has discussed updates to the Silver requirements > document following a review, discussion at a Face to Face meeting, and > survey (https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/Silver_Requirements/results) > and the chairs believe that there is a consensus to accept the requirements > document. > > > > Requirements document: https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/ > > > > Call minutes: Silver requirements update > <https://www.w3.org/2019/05/07-ag-minutes.html#item01> > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Thanks, > > AWK > > > > Andrew Kirkpatrick > > Head of Accessibility > > Adobe > > > > akirkpat@adobe.com > > http://twitter.com/awkawk > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0> > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 12 May 2019 00:26:43 UTC