Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 acceptance criteria and process

+1

The 2.2 process and SC acceptance criteria look good to me.


Léonie.
On 07/05/2019 12:24, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday 10^th May at 12 noon Boston time.
> 
> The Working Group has discussed the WCAG 2.2 process document:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.2_working_process
> 
> And acceptance requirements:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.2_Success_criteria_acceptance_requirements 
> 
> 
> The discussion can be reviewed in this survey:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22process2/results
> 
> And call minutes:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2019/04/09-ag-minutes.html#item03
> 
> The changes to the acceptance requirements as a result of the discussion 
> can be seen in this ‘wiki diff’:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/index.php?title=WCAG_2.2_Success_criterion_acceptance_requirements&type=revision&diff=10329&oldid=10158 
> 
> 
> If you have concerns about theproposed WCAG 2.2 process or acceptance 
> criteria that have not been discussed already and feel that those 
> concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, 
> please let the group know before the CfC deadline.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> -Alastair
> 
> -- 
> 
> www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com/>
> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653
> follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc
> Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT
> 
> Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411
> 

-- 
@TetraLogical TetraLogical.com

Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2019 12:30:50 UTC