- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 23:23:33 +0000
- To: "Abma, J.D. (Jake)" <Jake.Abma@ing.com>
- CC: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2018 23:23:59 UTC
Hi Jake, > About 3, functional / value states will be even more of a discussion point when for instance adding ARIA states / values, as these were recently extended. The 1st part of question 3 is: Do you agree that ‘functional states’ are covered by the current SC text. Having agreed with 2 (“States do not have to be differentiated within the component, e.g. hover is not required”), we would need to establish how/why these other states are covered. If the group decides that functional states aren’t covered (except that the component must maintain contrast) then we would look at another SC to fill the gap, such as the one Detlev suggested here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/559 Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Saturday, 15 December 2018 23:23:59 UTC