Re: CFC - COGA document split

+1

Steve


On 28/11/2018 16:07, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> This is a request from the Cognitive and Learning Disabilities (COGA) 
> Task Force to both of COGA's parent WAI Working Groups, the Accessible 
> Platform Architectures (APA) Working Group, and the Accessible 
> Guidelines (AG) Working Group.
> 
> This CfC seeks consensus to split the existing COGA Gap Analysis Working 
> Draft publication into two separate note-track documents.
> 
> As work on the existing Gap Analysis document has progressed, what began 
> as an Appendix has grown in import and size to the extent that COGA now 
> believes our target audience for these documents is better served by two 
> separate documents rather than a single document. That is the basis for 
> this CfC.
> 
> If this Call for Consensus fails, no change will result.
> 
> If the Call for Consensus is approved:
> 
> 1. The existing COGA Gap Analysis document will be split into two 
> separate note track documents as follows:
> 
> - Gap Analysis
> 
> https://w3c.github.io/coga/gap-analysis/
> 
> - A First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of "Making content usable for 
> people with cognitive and learning disabilities" will be authorized:
> 
> https://w3c.github.io/coga/content-usable/
> 
> 2. Standing permission for COGA to publish updated working drafts will 
> be authorized for both documents.
> 
> Please note that there is a 'Design Themes' section in the new document 
> which has links to a third document. There is still discussion about the 
> name and optimal disposition of that third document. Whether or not it 
> eventually becomes an additional note track document is not part of this 
> CfC.
> 
> ACTION TO TAKE
> 
> This CfC is now open for objection, comment, as well as statements of 
> support via email. Silence will be interpreted as support, though 
> messages of support are certainly welcome.
> 
> If you object to this proposed action, or have comments concerning this 
> proposal, please respond by replying on list to this message no later 
> than *Midnight Boston Time on Tuesday 4th December*.
> 
> IMPORTANT: If you are a member of both AG and APA you should vote on 
> both CfCs. AG and APA need to determine whether a consensus exists 
> independently of each other.
> 
> Thanking you for your attention on this question,
> 
> Alastair Campbell
> 
> AG Co-Chair
> 
> Janina Sajka
> 
> APA Chair
>

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2018 11:02:14 UTC