Re: CFC - Two editorial Errata

+1

Cheers,
David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:55 AM Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> AGWG’ers,
>
>
>
> As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC and no
> responses indicating that group members could not live this this decision,
> this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.
>
>
>
> This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FWAI%2FGL%2Fwiki%2FDecisions&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1ab6006ec2be48e88f9008d4a210961e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636311639507586899&sdata=IafGoKjeQf7zBqxVj8m380hh8%2BWgU1VfPa2tZjq0Bx8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Head of Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 09:29
> *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *CFC - Two editorial Errata
> *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 09:28
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Friday September 28 at 9am Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has discussed one editorial errata during the working
> group call (https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/460 and
> https://www.w3.org/2018/09/25-ag-minutes.html#item07) and another was
> just reported that is so straightforward that this chair estimates 100%
> support for (https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/488).
>
>
>
> Errata #1:
>
> The text under the Understandable principle is currently “Information and
> the operation of user interface must be understandable.” There is a small
> grammatical issue which the group proposes to resolve by changing the text
> to “Information and operation of the user interface must be
> understandable.” (adding “the” before “user interface”).
>
> Reference: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#understandable
>
>
>
> Errata #2:
>
> An issue was submitted this morning (
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/488) that pointed out that the text
> immediately following the “Robust” principle is “Content must be robust
> enough that it can be interpreted by by a wide variety of user agents,
> including assistive technologies.” (note the “by by”). As this is different
> from the WCAG 2.0 text and the group intended to not make any change, the
> proposal for this Editorial Errata is to indicate that this text should
> match the WCAG 2.0 version, which is “Content must be robust enough that it
> can be interpreted reliably by a wide variety of user agents, including
> assistive technologies.” (uses “reliably by” instead of “by by”).
>
> Reference: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#robust
>
>
>
> In accepting this CFC, you are agreeing to mark issues 460 and 488 as
> editorial errata per the W3C’s process for indicating Errata to a published
> specification.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Head of Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fawkawk&data=02%7C01%7C%7C54093524ef264326424008d51cd66c05%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636446629619786436&sdata=c5UP0xiniJIppvd6Esu1XA%2FbX1ykpABkhgCCmBp%2Fht8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>