RE: WCAG2ICT for WCAG 2.1

Hi David, this is very helpful and I agree.  The only comment I have is that I noticed 1.4.12 is listed as 4.1.12 in the link.  Also the notes for 1.4.12 seem more like 4.1.2.  My main suggestion would be around the language for 1.4.12 which seem to get into the API rather than what the markup language supports.

Jonathan

From: David MacDonald <david@can-adapt.com>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 5:54 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; WCAG Editors <team-wcag-editors@w3.org>
Subject: WCAG2ICT for WCAG 2.1

Hi All

It has been announced that the new EN 301 549 is referencing the WCAG 2.1 and WCAG2ICT for electronic documents which is great news for the WCAG 2.1.

This brings up the point that the WCAG2ICT needs an update to 2.1 because it is based on WCAG 2.0. So documents don't have the same requirements around contrast, etc. I've made a pass an unofficial draft of what an updated WCAG2ICT might look like.

http://davidmacd.com/WCAG/wcag2ict-21-discussion.html





--
Cheers,
David MacDonald



CanAdapt Solutions Inc.
Mobile:  613.806.9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd<http://twitter.com/davidmacd>

GitHub<https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com<http://www.can-adapt.com/>



  Adapting the web to all users
            Including those with disabilities

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>